Burna Boy Explains Why Nigeria Was Never Meant to Exist

Afro-fusion superstar Damini Ogulu, popularly known as Burna Boy, recently shared his thoughts on Nigeria’s origin, describing it as an unintended outcome of colonial business interests. In a candid interview with Tidal, the African Giant explained that the formation of Nigeria was not based on the natural will or unity of its people, but rather a result of British colonial strategy. He expressed the view that Nigeria was essentially a business deal that went awry, with the country’s citizens serving as “collateral damage” in a larger economic scheme.

Burna Boy highlighted that the territory now known as Nigeria was initially called the Niger Area, a name derived from the River Niger. It was managed as a business concern by the Royal Niger Company before it was formally taken over by the British government. This transition was motivated by economic interests, not by any cultural or political rationale that considered the well-being or wishes of the inhabitants.

According to Burna Boy, the amalgamation of Northern and Southern Nigeria in 1914 was another business decision that ignored the distinct cultural and social identities of the regions. The British aimed to simplify their administration and maximize economic exploitation, without regard to the long-term impact on the region’s diverse communities. The resulting entity, Nigeria, was thus a product of convenience for the colonial powers, rather than a nation built on a shared identity or purpose.

Burna Boy elaborated that the local population had no say in these arrangements and were effectively treated as commodities. He referred to Nigerians as “collateral damage,” emphasizing that their existence as a unified political entity was more about serving the economic goals of foreign powers than fostering genuine national development or unity.

The Afro-fusion artist’s comments have sparked significant debate on social media, with many users reacting strongly to his interpretation of Nigerian history. Some agreed with his perspective, noting that the country’s arbitrary borders and forced unification have led to long-standing ethnic and regional tensions. Others, however, criticized him for his bluntness and perceived negativity, suggesting that he should focus on more constructive discussions about the country’s future.

Despite the mixed reactions, Burna Boy’s remarks have brought renewed attention to Nigeria’s colonial past and its ongoing influence on contemporary issues. His commentary also highlights a broader conversation about the legacy of colonialism in Africa and how modern African states can navigate their complex histories to create more cohesive and prosperous societies.