Sophia Momodu’s Strong Legal Move in Custody Battle with Davido
Sophia Momodu has taken significant legal action against Davido’s bid for joint custody of their daughter, Aurora Imade Adeleke. This move has stirred public debate in Nigeria over paternal rights and custody issues, bringing attention to the broader discussions on parenting and legal responsibilities.
In response to Davido’s lawsuit, filed on April 17, 2024, Sophia Momodu has submitted a detailed 102-paragraph affidavit through her legal representatives at Punuka Attorneys. Davido, legally known as David Adeleke, seeks joint custody and unrestricted access to their daughter, Imade. He argues that despite their relationship ending years ago, he has continuously provided financial support and wishes to play an active role in Imade’s upbringing.
Davido has expressed concerns about Sophia’s demand for an $800 monthly nanny salary, which he deems excessive. Additionally, he has alleged mistreatment by Sophia, further complicating the custody battle. His legal action aims to secure a more balanced arrangement where he can be more involved in his daughter’s life.
Sophia Momodu’s legal team, led by Dr. Anthony Idigbe SAN and Dr. Bimpe Ajegbomogun, has mounted a strong defense to protect her custodial rights and counter Davido’s claims. They are focused on demonstrating that Sophia’s current custodial arrangements are in Imade’s best interest. The affidavit details her position and challenges Davido’s assertions, striving to maintain the status quo of her sole custody.
The next court hearing, set for July 5, 2024, will be a critical juncture in this high-profile custody battle. As both parties prepare to present their cases, the outcome will not only impact their lives but also potentially influence public opinion and legal precedents regarding custody and parental rights in Nigeria.
This case underscores the complexities of co-parenting and custody disputes, particularly when public figures are involved. The legal battle between Davido and Sophia Momodu continues to captivate the public, reflecting the ongoing debates about the best interests of children, parental responsibilities, and the legal frameworks governing custody.
As the situation unfolds, many are watching closely to see how the court will balance the interests of both parents while prioritizing the welfare of their daughter, Imade. The decision will likely have lasting implications for all involved and could serve as a reference point for similar cases in the future.
